|
Flat Panels
Rear-Projection TV Front Projectors Receivers HT in a Box Speakers Recently Added
Video Displays
All In One HT
Speakers
Sources
Electronics
Other Hardware
Custom Install
Software Hook Me Up HT Talks To Boot Camp Advice From the Experts Ask Home Theater Shane Buettner Mark Fleischmann Audio/Video News CEDIA 2009 CES 2009 CEDIA 2008 CES 2008 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 CES 2007 CEDIA 2006 AV Links HT Galleries A/V Glossary Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital HT Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Flatscreen TVs LCD TVs Plasma TVs HDTV AV Receivers Home Theater in a Box Digital Projectors DLP Projectors Video Projectors Surround Sound Dolby 5.1 |
Are You Getting All of the HDTV Resolution You Expected? Round 2
It's now time for the 2006 models, and we have tested 61 new HDTVs using the 1080i HDTV format that most of the HDTV channels use (including CBS, NBC, CW, MTV HD, and Wealth HD), as well as the current HD DVD and Blu-ray disc players. The question is, does the latest crop of HDTVs retain all of the detail in the broadcast or HD disc and send it to the screens at its native resolution? Or do they fail to properly handle the signal, cutting the image resolution down by as much as 50 percent? A 1080i (broadcast or Blu-ray/HD DVD) signal, is created by transmitting each frame in two parts called fields. The first field is broadcast in 1/60 of a second and consists of odd-numbered horizontal lines, followed in the next 1/60 of a second by the even-numbered horizontal lines. Together, they can create a full-resolution, 1,080-line frame. Some TVs take every one of the 1,080 interlaced lines and convert them to a progressive signal. This process is known as deinterlacing. It compensates for any motion in the image and sends it to the screen at its native resolution. Other HDTVs may take a cheaper shortcut and simply upconvert each single 540-line field. The latter process can result in a loss of up to 50 percent of the image's resolution (for a 1080p display). For the 2006 model year, we have added two tests: one for 3:2 conversion of 24-frame-based sources and another for detecting whether the set passes the full signal bandwidth to the screen. The test patterns come from Silicon Optix's new high-definition 1080i HQV test disc played on the Toshiba HD-XA1 HD DVD player. The disc contains a number of display-evaluation test signals and other content and should be available to consumers by the time you read this.
Deinterlace Test
3:2 Tests Without HD inverse telecine, the television's processor may discard up to half of the image resolution (prior to conversion in 720p displays) during horizontal pans. So, regardless of what you may have read elsewhere-or what your local TV-store sales clerk has told you-if a 1080p display's processor is capable of content based on HD 3:2 inverse telecine (and properly deinterlaces, as well), you can see all of the content in full 1080p resolution. You don't need to wait for 1080p broadcast or HD DVD disc players with 1080p output to do so. This test also uses the SMPTE 133 pattern (without the addition of the rotating white line) "panned" right to left and back again at 24 frames per second. The Silicon Optix 1080i HQV HD DVD is mastered at 1080i/30 with a 3:2 cadence inserted, like any 24-frame film transfer to video. If the processor properly handles the signal, the boxes with the horizontal lines described above will remain intact. If not, either the boxes will strobe between all black and all white (as with the deinterlace test), or you will see vertical bands on the sides of the box. (See image directly below) Strobing or banding constitutes a "fail," as resolution will drop during pans.
Bandwidth Test
The Results First up was the deinterlacing test. The bad news is that 54.09 percent of the 61 sets failed. The good news is that the HDTVs from Hitachi, JVC, and Pioneer all passed, just as these manufacturers claim in their respective literature. Mitsubishi has upgraded their 1080p DLP rear projectors' processors in the time since their 2005 models failed. Now they all pass. Sharp has a number of 2006 sets that passed, whereas, last year, all of their models failed. The 3:2 test results were far more disastrous, with a failure rate of 80.33 percent. But sets by JVC, Pioneer, and Hitachi (see notation) passed this one, as did a number of other manufacturers' products, although there were some mixed results, depending on the specific model. The bandwidth test results were very interesting. Since I measured the sets, Sony claims to have made a production change in their latest 1080p rear projector (KDS-50A2000) to correct its failure in the test, which is a testament to the importance of full bandwidth in 1080p displays. With this modification, and after changes in the user menu of other Sony models (see chart), all of the 1080p sets passed, although all but one of them attenuated the pattern. While good signal processing for proper deinterlacing, 3:2 conversion, and bandwidth is extremely important to obtain a superb high-definition picture, there are some other factors-including contrast ratio, motion lag, and black level-that make big differences in picture quality. Use the chart to find the sets that pass, and then compare the passing sets with other displays. If the other factors are about the same, the HDTV with the proper signal processing will produce the better image.
33 of 61 Fail = 54.09% 49 of 61 fail = 80.33%
Key
* Sharp fails in factory default setting of Fast mode; will pass if user menu changes to Slow mode
|
|
||||||||||||||||||


Can't read it? Click