 Site Links
Flat Panels
Rear-Projection TV Front Projectors Receivers HT in a Box Speakers Recently Added
Video Displays
All In One HT
Speakers
Sources
Electronics
Other Hardware
Custom Install
Software Hook Me Up HT Talks To Boot Camp Advice From the Experts Ask Home Theater Shane Buettner Mark Fleischmann Audio/Video News CES 2010 CEDIA 2009 CES 2009 CEDIA 2008 CES 2008 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 CES 2007 CEDIA 2006 AV Links HT Galleries A/V Glossary Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital HT Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Flatscreen TVs LCD TVs Plasma TVs HDTV AV Receivers Home Theater in a Box Digital Projectors DLP Projectors Video Projectors Surround Sound Dolby 5.1 |
 |
|
|
The Great 1080p HDTV Face Off:
JVC HD-56FH96 Rear-Projection HDTV
Brightness. Smoothness. As the indirect successor to our 2005 Best RPTV RAVE Award winner, it wasn't a surprise that the JVC did so well. What was surprising is that it tied for second place despite having the worst contrast ratio, the highest black level, and, in its highest contrast-ratio mode, the lowest overall light output. Just as the Samsung's excellent measurements don't tell the whole story, the JVC's relatively poor measurements don't, either.
The Fifth Element portion of the test revealed the first area in which the JVC was superior to just about every other TV in the Face Off. In chapter 5, there was very little noise in the shadows behind Brucey's face. John commented that the overall image had "very little grain to it." Most of the judges felt that the image was a little softer than the other TVs, but not badly so. Nikhil felt it was a sort of "pleasant" softness. As he disliked the Samsung's artificial detail the most, it's not surprising he liked this direction better.
On the processing side, the JVC was just south of mid-pack. Its 3:2 pickup was a little slow but not as bad as some of the others. The same was true of the video processing. There were some jagged edges, but it was better than some and worse than some in this regard.
The color points were off by about as much as the Toshiba and the Sony. Each of the judges made a comment about the color in one way or another, but none felt that it was a big issue. The remote is the same that has come with every JVC RPTV in the last few years. It's backlit and has tons of buttons, but none of them are direct input access. While all RPTVs (in this Face Off and in general) produce some amount of noise in the screen itself, our judges only commented on this point with the JVC. Adrienne called it a sort of "sheen" but said that moving back just a few inches removed it from view. Mostly, the JVC earned its place by having a relatively low-noise picture and by not doing anything really wrong. Its exceptional brightness makes this an easy choice for a TV that does double duty on any given Sunday.
Highlights
At A Glance: JVC HD-56FH96 Rear-projection HDTV
Connections
Features
Ratings: JVC HD-56FH96 Rear-Projection HDTV
Build Quality: 92
Value: 88
Features: 91
Performance: 92
Ergonomics: 90
Overall Rating: 91
General Information
HT Labs Measures: JVC HD-56FH96 Rear-Projection HDTV
Full-On/Full-Off Contrast Ratio—1570:1;
Measured Resolution with the Leader LT-446:
DC Restoration (poor, average, good, excellent): Average (In Theater Pro mode)
Color Decoder (poor, average, good, excellent): Excellent
Measured Color Points:
The left chart shows the HD-56FH96's gray scale relative to its color temperature at various levels of intensity, or brightness (20 IRE is dark gray; 100 IRE is bright white). The gray scale as set by the factory, in the low color-temperature mode measures cool with dark images and warm with brighter images. After making adjustments using the Photo Research PR-650, the gray scale measures sort of better, within 809 Kelvin of D6500, the accurate color temperature, across the entire range.
The right chart shows the gray scale (or color temperature) relative to the color points of the display's red, green, and blue LCOS chips. These are off those specified by SMPTE. Red is slightly oversaturated and very slightly reddish-orange. Blue is slightly oversaturated. Green is very oversaturated.
After calibration, and using a full-field 100-IRE white (91.04 foot-lamberts) and a full-field 0-IRE black (0.058 ft-L), the contrast ratio was 1,070:1. Using a 16-box checkerboard pattern (ANSI contrast), the contrast ratio was 208:1. The best contrast ratio was achieved in the Theater setting. The brightest image was achieved in the Dynamic setting and produced 216.5 ft-L with a 100-IRE white and 0.186 ft-L with a 0-IRE black, a contrast ratio of 1164:1—GM
|
|
|
|
 Sponsored Technology Center
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
While the black level was the worst in the Face Off it wasn't high enough to bother anyone. At 0.058 ft-L, it is still lower than just about every direct-view LCD and many plasmas. It's also less than half the black level of the last JVC HD-ILA RPTV we reviewed. With its iris set for the best contrast ratio, the overall light output was 91 ft-L, or about 9 percent lower than the next lowest (the Toshiba). With its iris fully open, it is capable of an eye clinching 216.5 ft-L, which is a truly startling amount of light from a 56-inch display. I mean deer-in-the-headlights startling.
